This is a big problem. It creates the illusion that /c/cats on one particular instance is the real /c/cats.

This is the root of re-centralization and it must be pulled out.

  • atypicaloddity@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think part of the issue is that all the different Lemmy and kbin instances are trying to be Reddit themselves. By which I mean there are a bunch of instances with no focus. They’re all “kitchen sink” instances, each with their own Politics, Tech, Cats, etc.

    Lemmy.world, lemmy.ml, kbin.social, fedia.io. All of them are generic reddit alternatives, but the real reddit alternative is the amalgamation of subscriptions from multiple more focused instances.

    Startrek.website is a great example of the opposite: it’s an instance focused on one topic, where some people will want to sign up as a user and others will want to just subscribe to one of their three (!) boards from their own instance. They don’t need their own Politics topic, users on the site that care about it will subscribe to a politics topic from another instance. The startrek admins and mods only have to care about their one focus.

    My ideal fediverse feed would be pulling individual topics from a few dozen more focused instances instead of one generalist instance. I think that’s what’s going to end up happening.

    • BlueÆther@no.lastname.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      There are 3 instance for *.nz, lemmy.nz, no.lastname.nz and feddit.nz

      @Dave@lemmy.nz and I (no.lastname.nz) have been workin together so we don’t overlap with nz based communities, with Dave concentrating on general NZ communities and I’m concentrating on more environmental type communities (Wildlife/Outdoors/Trees[therapeutic use based])

      We probably need more collaboration for smaller communities, but there will always be different takes on topics and moderation.

    • fleabomber@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I like filling up my feed with some content while I figure this stuff out. It’ll be easy to ditch the annoying instances once I know what I’m doin.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t believe most Lemmy users will tolerate maintaining more than one account on once instance. If I can’t see it from my account, then it doesn’t exist. This is all starting to sound like old school phpbb forum with new paint.

      • atypicaloddity@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        You don’t need more than one account. You just decide which instance you want an account on, then subscribe to all the topics you care about across multiple instances. I just think that generalist instances with thousands of local topics are unnecessary.

      • The Cuuuuube@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why would you create a new account to browse the startrek dedicated instance instead of subscribing to the community that lives on their instance?

        • WaDef7@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Also, this might just be personal experience, but so far I’m finding it far easier to browse a single community on no matter what general instance rather than going through a separate topic-focused instance.

  • fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    When using email, be aware that george@aol.com is the real George. All other Georges on all other email servers are fake.

      • fuser@quex.cc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        there are alive cats and dead cats at the same time.

    • codus@leby.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      +1 The provider you choose has complete control of your account. You only have access when their server is up. They control updates.

      If they don’t have good backups you could lose everything. It may be unpopular but I think most would be wise to pick one of the already established major instances.

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      However, that also adds confusion for someone trying to figure out whether or not to use the service in the first place.

      So they need to choose an instance. How do they pick an instance? There’s all this talk about defederation and all of that, so do they need to do a bunch of research to figure out who is where, to register? Oh wait, one of the big instances aren’t taking signups, and another is restricted, based on application.

      That’s a lot of legwork for someone who is used to being able to go to “lemmy.social.network”, register, and just go. You don’t have to research Twitter or Reddit ahead of time, to figure out if you ended up in a server-region that was locked out from the others with seemingly no explanation or warning, or suddenly lose access because of some kind of operator issue with some other server.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Beehaw is not federated, it functionally has ceased to exist.

      There will not be a winner instance.

      If all of the Lemmy federation cannot be read from any random instance, then it already is a failed experiment.

      Not 1% of1% of1% of 1% cares what the instance name is or what their rules are. I am probably still missing many orders of magnitude.

      The beehaw controversy is obvious. You don’t need to know the specific. I don’t know them and I don’t care about them nor what their story is.

      The lesson is clear, tyrannical instance owners exists, and they will leverage your participation against you and cut your relationship.

      There exists poisonous instances on Lemmy and they must be disempowered. Instances must be nothing more than portals to the whole. They must have no power.

      • farmer_bobathan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Dude, it’s obvious you don’t understand how lemmy or the fediverse works. You need to read more and maybe ask questions to clear up your misunderstanding before you go around making grand pronouncements about how lemmy should be run. A little bit of humility goes a long way.

      • The Cuuuuube@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Beehaw is defederated from two major popular instances and in talks with the admins of those instances about the path for refederation. I’m looking at this post from beehaw. You are taking an event, recasting it as something it isn’t, and trying to use that as evidence of a point. And in fact, you seem to be suggesting that instances that aren’t moderated how you want should be defederated. Which. Yes. That’s. That’s the point. That’s what Beehaw did. And they’re even communicating about how to move forwars

      • Deceptichum@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Utter bullshit.

        https://beehaw.org/instances

        You can scroll to the bottom and see it’s only defederated from a handful of instances.

        Furthermore these is no fucking Lemmy federation. Lemmy is one part of accessing the Fediverse. Ironic that someone worried one instance might get all the credit has no problem giving it all to one platform.

        Honestly I’m not far off thinking removing any Lemmy instance at all is the best bet, Lemtards are getting annoying.

      • Red Wizard 🪄@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        What are you on? So instances should have no say in regards to who they federate with? Also it sounds like you’re advocating for centralization… Why would we want that?

  • Eddie@l.lucitt.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I feel like this is how it will realistically happen though. People will flock to one instance and use that one community, otherwise it becomes too stagnated.

    The best thing about federation is that if that hugely popular community’s instance were to crash/go down, the community can just join another one. Sure it might take some coordination, but why not have one central place to hang out until it gets shitty?

    Imagine youre at your favorite bar. They get new owners and then all their prices change. But hey guess what, you can make an exact copy of the same bar on a different instance! “Hey guys, lets all go to this new bar thats literally the same thing across the street!” and then everybody is happy.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is really terrible news. This means Lemmy has no chance. It’s just another Reddit. I hope this flaw is fixed and soon.

      If the cool bar sells out and becomes a rip off. The community of that bar does up and leaves and then coherently as aunit join another bar.

      What happens is, that bar community simply dies. It’s members scatter. The end.

      If that was like you said, Reddit community as a whole would already have left Reddit and we’d all be here.

      This is a system killing bug.

      • T156@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lemmy is seen as another Reddit, that’s why people are coming over to use it as a potential alternative.

        I’m also not convinced that the community would scatter entirely. Things might be scattering now, but this is more like the entire Earth being blown up for some space highway.

        Whereas previously on Reddit, the community might splinter, with some parts going off to make their own subreddits, effectively moving to a new bar. It’s happened before, with multiple subs.

        /r/anime_titties was created due to issues with how /r/worldnews was moderated, /r/curatedtumblr was created due to issues with bots and inactive moderation on /r/tumblr, so on.

        But moving subreddits is a far cry from moving to a whole other site, with its own communities, quirks, and issues, where they might be losing out on creature comforts, and the identity that they’ve built up on Reddit.

      • sotolf@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What does scatter really mean in the threadiverse? You and me sit in different bars, and can communicate and see the same communities, so it doesn’t really matter if we are “scattered” or all on the same instance, since we still see and can communicate on the same places.

  • Myriadblue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s not how I read it. They were saying it didn’t matter because of federation you can sub to any of them wherever they are.

  • Lvxferre@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    OP, could you please link the archive too? The community is set up to NSFW so you can’t access it without account, and let us not create accounts in that shithole again.

    Here’s an archive link for the full thread, as OP here is focusing on one comment.

    Anyway: yes, there is a communication problem. I think that the “the whole” and the flagship instances should be called by different names; I’ve been using “the Lemmyverse” (subset of the Fediverse) and “lemmy.ml flagship instance” (subset of the Lemmyverse) respectively, but that is far from ideal. And what happens is that you invite people to the Lemmyverse and they end in lemmy.ml. Mastodon has a similar problem, by the way.

    Specifically on r/stallmanwasright: I used to participate a fair bit in that [rather small] sub, so I’m happy to see them coming to the Lemmyverse. And I feel like it actually fits well within the flagship instance, as it’s focused on FOSS enthusiasts. I hope to see u/sigbhu (the head mod there) around - I might not like his approach as moderator*, but in general he’s fairly sensible as a person, and his opinions are often worth listening to.

    *he tends to confuse too much his personal views with community views.

      • Lvxferre@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sorry, I edited my comment in the meantime. (Fixing broken grammar, linking the archives, stuff like this.) That said:

        Then Lemmy is going to just beat repeat of voat

        Not really. Even in worst case scenario (everyone migrates to a single instance), lemmy.ml is considerably wider in scope and userbase than the socially rejected in Voat.

        And, while I do agree with you that there is a communication problem, and that it needs to be addressed, it is far from the worst case scenario. For example I consistently see here people from beehaw, lemmy.world, fedddit.de, and other instances.

        Why is /c/ federation disabled by default.

        Federation happens between instances, not between communities. You can access any community from a federated instance.

        If federation is disabled by default (is it?), I think that this might have to do with spam and bot prevention. I’m not sure however.


        Now, off-topic:

        While I get that spending time in Reddit made us people behave less like decent human beings and more like dumbarses/redditors/morons, even then I think that we should watch out to not behave as such outside Reddit. Let its stupidity culture die with it.

        From your comment, three things caught my attention:

        • assuming that things that you don’t understand “make no sense”.
        • lack of insight - why are you giving views to that shithole?
        • decontextualisation - ipsis ungulis “Then read it locally with libreddit”, letting the reader to guess what you’re referring to. (I got it, but someone else 2m later won’t).

        Please, don’t.

        • sotolf@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think what they mean by /c/ federation is combining the communities, so that c/technology would combine lemmy.world/c/technology and kbin.social/m/technology and lemmy.ml/c/technology, but I’m not 100% sure.

          • Lvxferre@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            If that is indeed what the other poster meant, then it’s even worse - it’s missing the point of federation, that is “let’s not centralise our discussions within a single place, as this gives too much power to the people who control that place”.

            • sotolf@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Sure, I agree with you :) I just wanted to clear up what I saw as a misunderstanding, not argue against your point :)

  • Unblended@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    While true, people seem to pretty immediately get it once it’s clear where to see the source instance. If they care, they’re usually surprised, and then the reason magazines on different instances are different makes sense.

    I’m not sure what there is to do about it, the impression that there is one magazine is a relic of centralization, all there is to do is explain that it is not the case when people are inevitably confused. I hate simplifying it to “bob@microsoft.com and bob@apple.com are different people” because I know it feels more complicated than that but it seems like it doesn’t take that long to click honestly.

    Best I figure is to have welcoming communities that don’t turn into asshats if someone is confused or asks questions. This doesn’t seem like something you can force people to understand before they run into a problem and try to figure out what’s going on. Eventually there will be an AI bot that answers questions I’m sure…!

  • federico3@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This is not a communication problem. Communities are indeed centralized and if an instance is shut down permanently or loses its data all the communities are gone. This is a big design problem of Lemmy.

    Edit: it’s sometimes possible to rebuild new communities on another instance and recover past messages that have been replicated on other instances (if there were full replicas) but this requires all users and moderators to agree on where to migrate and avoid splits and so on.

        • HTTP_404_NotFound@lemmyonline.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Its actually possible to take the local copy, and set it as a local community…

          With a few database commands.

          So, migrating communities from offline servers is possible as long as it was federated and synced beforehand

          • federico3@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s besides the point. Of course it’s always possible to create new communities on new instances, and import posts from various sources, but the original community would be still gone.

            If an instance is shut down or becomes unusable for a long time there is no way to automatically migrate users to a new instance. Additionally, there is also no guarantee that all users will move to the same alternative instance. This can also cause unnecessary conflict around which alternative instance becomes the “legitimate” successor.

    • Lvxferre@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is not a case of stupidity (unwillingness to think). It’s ignorance (lack of information). You can’t fix stupidity but you can fix ignorance with information.