I have read the FAQ of KDE Neon: it is well made and answers ground questions like “Is it a distro?” or “Can I turn Kubuntu into KDE Neon?”

…And yet I’m confused, because I’m just a newbie in the Linux world. For instance, when they say “on top of a stable base” I don’t know what’s meant as a “base”.

I think I understand that it isn’t a distro, but it fascinates me that it’s meant to be installed from an ISO or similar, just like a distro.

I wonder if any of you can explain:

  • What is it, in different words?
  • Why is it “implemented” as it is?
  • Are there any other “quasi-distros” like KDE Neon out there?
  • Do you use it? how has your experience with it been?

Cheers!

  • Nia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    For that part, they’re just saying that other desktop environments are unsupported. Back when I used KDE Neon I had no problems using it as a daily OS, it is technically less stable (in terms of the system changing with updates, not in terms of crashing) since all the KDE software is updated regularly, but the rest of the software is the same as regular Ubuntu LTS.

    I’d say the best way to think of KDE Neon is “Ubuntu LTS, with the latest KDE software directly from them, with less guarantee of stability” imo.

    Edit: They also say they’re not “quite” a distro, it is by full definition a distro, but their goal is different. The only intent of KDE Neon is to have a stable base with up to date KDE stuff, while a “distro” as they are saying will have a goal of being a fully fledged OS (or similar). Neon can be used as a full distro, but that’s just a side effect rather than the intent.

    • stravanasu@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thank you, very helpful! May I ask what you use now? Do you know if they add their software via snaps or flatpaks?

      • Nia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I use Debian now. And for kde neon they add their software via debs as regular packages, but you can add either snap or flatpak to it if you want (or both), can’t remember if they preinstall flatpak or not.

        • stravanasu@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Cheers! I’ve heard that one can install Debian and simply choose KDE there. I’m weighing my options… Undecided among Debian+KDE, Kubuntu, and KDE Neon. Although it also depends on how each deals with my machine. Will have to try some live disks…

          • Nia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Hope they work out for you!

            Also, I’d say of the three, if you want the one that will “just work” the most, I would go with Kubuntu, mainly because you’ll be able to search for stuff and problem fixes easier since there’s a lot of info online for it, because it’s the most commonly used of the three I believe. The other two are still perfectly fine options though, but I think Kubuntu would be the smoothest experience, as you said you were still a bit new to Linux in your post.

        • Grangle1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Both Flatpak and Snap are preinstalled but it defaults to debs/apt. Though through the command line they strongly recommend the pkcon command over apt itself.

    • stravanasu@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Now I understand. Kubuntu instead makes modifications to the Ubuntu core. Although Neon must be somehow removing Gnome, I imagine.