Too bad. Thought you’d be smarter than this. Have a nice day, smart guy.

Maybe you should form that spaghetti source initiative.

You’d have some authority to speak about what spaghetti source is then.

I did not say that free software and open source software are the same thing.

You brought free software into the argument.

This license that the OP software is using probably isn’t even free software, though.

Though, I personally don’t really care too much about it.

Open source has a definition and it’s the OSI definition.

I hope any other argument you bring is an actual different definition other than „it doesn’t have any“. Because that is a net negative point to make.

If you don’t like the OSI definition I’d hope you bring a competing one. Maybe as part of your spaghetti source initiative.

It’s the definition defined by the organization that coined the term open source.

The concept existed before then, but that hardly matters when we are talking about the specific term.

They are the authority on the matter.

I do not mean free software as Stallman means it, when I am talking about Open Source, I mean exactly what the OSI means, because that is the widely accepted form of the term.

You can find the open source definition here:

https://opensource.org/osd/

No. AMD and intel both are fine. Nvidia has some issues, though it is getting better slowly there.