• JustARegularNerd@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m not a big Twitter user to begin with, so I assumed based on the title that it was going to be similar to YouTube disabling the dislike counter.

    This is making the list of posts you’ve “Liked” private. Saved you a click.

    Personally I’d like this to be a toggleable feature like Reddit has (had?), but otherwise, yeah seems like an obtuse change, I don’t understand the why behind it.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      68
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      People might not want to make it obvious that they support Nazi shit. This will make it easier for them to do so covertly.

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        53
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        My guess is that its to cover up patterns of this to protect specific rich guys from lawsuits. As a bonus it means its easier to add and subtract likes from posts without leaving clear evidence.

        So Elon himself can add 10,000 likes to an antisemitic post or subtract the likes from say somebody making fun of a cybertruck.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      The reason is probably that too many people got caught liking questionable content through the likes page.

    • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Besides what others say it also strenghtens monopoly on information, a resource used in research, but also valuable in creating hyped up LLMs (like Reddit did closing their API). Likes can be used to map which groups like what, which content is seen as valuable, singling out bot networks from organic reactions etc etc. This information enriches datasets you can gather (without paying Musk?).

      I would probably vouch for that info to be accessible to either no one or anyone. Twitter is still a public square where politicians and orgs announce stuff and leave their official remarks, so it’s more valuable if it’s transparent. And we also had some scandals with famous douches liking controversal shit or just porn from their main accounts (:

    • m13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s because Elon keeps getting caught out liking and boosting blatant white supremacist stuff. Who knows why. He really doesn’t seem to mind everyone knowing the fact that he’s a neo-Nazi.

      • spongebue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        “Huh, I hadn’t really considered this [kinda racist when you think about it] view, but it’s actually pretty popular [by bots] so maybe there’s something to this!”

    • warm@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Likes and the like should be public, then there’s no tampering and people who like the insane shit can’t hide that fact. Dunno why people are still using that platform regardless.

  • Heavybell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I never liked the idea of my “likes” being a browsable list. What’s the point of retweeting, if likes are browsable?

    Glad it 's finally changing. Broken clock, I guess.