• m_f@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Would China not drop bombs if they faced no consequences and it benefited them?

    • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Idk, they probably have had the opportunity sometimes, but they don’t have the same military industrial complex as the USA pushing for it at every chance. So the cost benefit analysis is different. Quite often it doesn’t benefit “the USA” as much as a few specific people within, and that mechanic doesn’t exist in the same way for China.

      • m_f@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        What do you mean that mechanic doesn’t exist in the same way for China? Are you talking like China has achieved a classless utopia situation?

        • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          No, the arms manufacturers just don’t have the same level of influence over the government and armed forces that they do in America, and the people in the government who decide whether to drop bombs won’t personally get rich if they buy more bombs.

          That isn’t something unique to China btw but basically almost every country except USA and a few others.

          • m_f@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            18 minutes ago

            Do you think that dynamic wouldn’t exist for any country, including China, that had as much world influence as the US does now?