I wrote this blog post. Talking about an innovative open source license. Give me comments about it!
https://itsfoss.community/t/thinking-about-new-open-source-licenses/10965
@itsfoss @opensource @thelinuxEXP @nixCraft @gamingonlinux @omgubuntu @omglinux
You must log in or # to comment.
It would violate point six of the open source definition[0], so wouldn’t be an open source license.
Very nice. The first sentence is a bit of a run-on. The three question marks is a bit too informal. The sentence “If, on the other hand, the redistributed software, want to be sold too, must be purchased as it is equivalent to a for-profit company” has grammatical errors. Keep writing!
@ArcticAmphibian thanks for the feedback!
