I saw a post here (https://lemmy.ml/post/1179679) about some Chinese kid spending USD 64k on video games and I read the news article and found myself down a rabbit hole.

https://www.techspot.com/news/98980-13-year-old-spent-64000-parents-money-mobile.html

China has long held a dim view of video games, calling them “electronic drugs” a few years ago. It only allows those under 18 to play online games for one hour, between 8 pm and 9 pm local time, on Fridays, Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays.

So basicaly, this article says that China (or more accurately the Chinese government) has a dim view of video games.

So I kept digging and found this article:

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/30/business/media/china-online-games.html

“I think this is the right policy,” she said. “It amounts to the state taking care of our kids for us.”

This phrase just screams “BAD PARENT” to me.

Why do you have to offload the responsibility of caring for your children to the government? You chose to bring them into the world, now you’re responsible for them.

Which brings me to my question… why does China’s government hate video games so much? Why would they want to impose such draconian restrictions on childrens’ free time?

  • piezoelectron@sopuli.xyzEnglish
    1·
    1 year ago

    Just wanna suggest anyone reading this post that they should read “the govt of China” anytime they come across “China”. We in the Anglophone world love being hysterically scared/detesting of “the Chinese”, and our governments love it.

    • NuPNuA@lemm.eeEnglish
      1·
      1 year ago

      I mean, the government of a nation represent the will of the people and what they desire the nation to be like do they not? When they don’t, they eithert get voted out or removed by force.

      • piezoelectron@sopuli.xyzEnglish
        11·
        1 year ago

        This is a common misconception, but fully understandable one. If you look into political theory, one of the first things you discover is that all governments – whether they call themselves “democratic” or not – are, before anything else, at war with the people they claim to represent.

        The “people” – not rival foreign states – are the first group against which a state of at war with, whether the state in question is a monarchy, a republic, a dictatorship, a plutocracy or something else.

    • ColonelPanic@lemmy.mlEnglish
      1·
      1 year ago

      True, although that’s not just limited to “China”. Basically every country is treated as a homogenous block of people which is not that great for discussions.