• ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Not really. Just because they reverse engineered the protocol does not mean it is insecure.

    I guess we know too little to say much about that topic.

    • M500@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well if it’s all handled by Apple I can assume that there is a reasonable amount of security in the way the message is stored.

      If a third party gets involved, then I don’t know if the message is read, copied, or stored insecurely by them.

      • ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well if it’s all handled by Apple I can assume that there is a reasonable amount of security in the way the message is stored.

        If a third party gets involved, then I don’t know if the message is read, copied, or stored insecurely by them.

        I reall hope apples does not store or can even read the data. Otherwise it would be a really bad messaging protocol (privacy and security wise).

        • DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You know backdoors mandate this which is why everything is insecure. Most people have no clue that if the government has backdoors then it’s always insecure.