Because by law in certain countries, homosexuality is persona non grata, and a filter needs to be there to legally operate in such countries.
Because by law in certain countries, homosexuality is persona non grata, and a filter needs to be there to legally operate in such countries.
This company wasn’t exactly targeted. It could have happened to literally anyone.
Yep! Such container breakouts exist even today in Citrix !
Shit like this was what got me into cybersecurity
I learned to program when I was 10 on a Commodore 64. And we would wear an onion on our belt which was the style at the time… Sorry, where was I?
Totally get that, but we live in a much more dangerous and predatory computer landscape these days. It would be foolish not to take some precautions.
Standard Ubuntu should have you covered.
One word of warning though, don’t be too egregious with the parental controls. If your kids are motivated enough, they will find a way around it.
Education really is your best weapon here. Tell them about the dangers of the modern web and computing.
Yep! The security guard is also given a bunch of rules to follow such as “don’t let anyone outside of our neighbourhood (aka your local network) contact door 22”, which will also determine whether messages get delivered or not
Imagine your computer is a big block of flats and your applications are all people who live in the building.
Mail sent to the building address alone isn’t going to reach the intended recipient, because the postman doesn’t know what flat to post it to. So they need additional information such as ‘Flat 2C’
That’s the basic concept of ports. It’s basically additional addressing information to allow your computer to direct internet traffic to the correct applications.
When an application is actively listening on a port, it means that they are keeping an eye out for messages addressed to them, as designated by the port number. While an application is sending or receiving messages using a given port number, that port number is considered ‘open’.
Now, all sorts of applications do all sorts of things. Some are for the public to use and there are some that are useful within trusted circles, but can be abused by malicious people if anyone in the world can send messages to it. Thus, we have a firewall, which acts as a gatekeeper. A firewall can ‘block’ a port, denying access to a given group of people, or ‘unblock’ it, allowing access.
VPNs are a totally different thing. They are literally middlemen for your internet traffic. Instead of directly posting a message to somewhere and receiving a direct reply back, imagine you flew out to Italy to use a post box there and receive replies from there.
What they mean is if you are a affiliated with a national government. You might also be a target if you are very very rich.
If you’re an average Joe, they probably won’t burn it on you.
I mean personally I think it’s closer to those point and click adventure games, just shrunk down to be appropriate for a handheld of the day
“oh damn, you guys didn’t know? I feel bad for you but it’s probably too late for you now. Guess you’ll find out soon enough.”
Then: complete radio silence.
The only thing we can do is live the lives we have.
For as long as I’ve been alive we’ve always been on the brink of one thing or another. Worrying about the bits that you cannot change will only do you harm.
Because those are regular jobs and skills? Okay, maybe not COBOL nowadays but still.
A corrupted password policy might do this
Remember that we see this scene through Snape’s memories - something wizards are able to distort to varying degrees.
It may well be that we aren’t seeing the full story. It is revealed later that tit-for-tat behaviour was quite common to the both of them.
I understand the main thing was Yuzu was apparently offering builds that work with unreleased games (which how tf does that work)
Leaks and breaking release date is how it works.
Rebooting a franchise successfully needs a lot more thought than what they put into new Frasier.
Mario. Also Zelda
It’s been milked endlessly but definitely not disrespected a la Sonic. You know when you pick up one of these you’re in for a good time. It’s the kind of reputation Nintendo knows it relies on.
So this looks like it’s based in Java code.
A public class means that any bit of Java code, including that injected by an attacker, can see and mess with the contents of that class.
A private class, in contrast, means that other bits of Java code are restricted to running the class’s predefined functions.
In theory it is supposed to help with the security of the data. In practice if an attacker gets to this point, you’ve got much bigger issues.
I dunno, why don’t you ask, eg: Russia?