Remember kids, the only was to fight misogyny is to punish people who discuss or criticisize it

Oh, I think I’ve already seen this movie.

OK but I’m genuinely terrified by how common this is at my company, and its notably better at retention then the industry norm.

Screw Dead Internet Theory, this is my conspiracy: Crowdstrike style incidents are going to get more and more common as techdebt keeps growing.

Holy fuck yeah

constructive

kuhn-struhk-tiv

helping to improve; promoting further development or advancements

Has being told to come up with higher effort ideas ever helped you to improve your work? It’s never helped me, I’ve only ever been frustrated by it

deleted by creator

It may or may not be valid criticism, but it’s certainly not constructive. How is OP supposed to change based off your comment? Do you really think they learned something from it?

…but it wasn’t constructive?

Sorry, I meant professional company emails. Obviously people can make up whatever private gmail account they want. And people can state their preferred name, but the fact that if I call my coworker “Josh” and their last name is “Jacobson”, the fact that I can type in Josh.Jacobson and find them is extremely helpful, and I don’t get why companies would complicate that by making it “jojacko” .

I mean yeah, but it happens even more with the naming scheme in the original post. Most companies just add a number when that happens. Predictable naming schemes, at least as the default, make it a lot easier to find people in large companies.

Jerboa’s been a bit confusing for me too. Does anyone know how to find communities on other instances?

Watch me engage with someone