what’s easier? Convincing everyone you know to download signal or whatsapp or matrix or whatever or
having that built into the text app[convincing everyone to buy the same phone].
FTFY
When presented this way, the choice is very different.
what’s easier? Convincing everyone you know to download signal or whatsapp or matrix or whatever or
having that built into the text app[convincing everyone to buy the same phone].
FTFY
When presented this way, the choice is very different.
Moats. I was kidding at first, but I’m now thinking lazy rivers are modern moats.
That sounds like an adult with a social and/or psychological issue.
I liked Devs. It had a dope concept. That show didn’t get much buzz.
Is it Missi Pyle’s husband Casey Anderson?
The picture’s not too clear, but I bet there aren’t a lot of famous people that are best friends with a bear.
I’ve always thought the hand signs would be difficult, but the best combination should be fire, water, sponge. Sponge soaks up water, water puts out fire, fire burns sponge to a crisp.
What piece of paper can really stop a rock?
And it’s upvoted
I’d rename two categories.
Bottom right: I’d rather refer to a cake as “lasagna” than call lasagna a “cake”
Bottom left: if someone made a quiche without walled sides I’d still call it a quiche, so I’d rather call that category “pie”
This has the added bonus of making most pie people furious and some pizza people angry unless they like Chicago deep dish.
No, I actually thought you were joking. I think people are pretty ordinary and can’t telepathically tell that stuff in text. I bet you can’t deduce my gender, orientation, race, hair color, and name. I assume this because I didn’t tell you any of these things.
You can’t be serious.
You never mentioned you were nonbinary. Isn’t it possible that people were being contrarian without being transphobic?
I don’t watch these, but they make a lot of sense. I’ve watched movies sometimes and been disappointed that there are no similar movies for me to watch. If you like a generic Hallmark movie you’ll have infinite content.
q1 and q2 can be negative. The force is the same as if they were positive because -1 x -1 = 1
I don’t mind this too much, but I’d want more padding for the kid and an extra wheel in the back for stability.
Of course, but if my vehicle was the only vehicle in the world, I’d still feel like a 2 year old kid on the back of my bike going 7 miles is more dangerous than on a bus, train, or even a car over the same distance.
I bet those people are doing it for economic reasons, not environmental ones. A bicycle is probably the most dangerous form of transportation for you to have your kid on.
Depends on the use case and the oversight. If I lose the ability to walk and an implant can make it easier I’ll take the implant. It’s unfortunate this type of technology didn’t exist for Hawking. With what he had he could only write a sentence a minute IIRC.
They are programmatically token predictors. It will never be “closer” to intelligence for that very reason. The broader question should be, “can a token predictor simulate intelligence?”