Lols [they/them]

i didnt voice any opinion on what the extreme or far left are, so i imagine you either didnt understand my comment or are being contrarian for the sake of being contrarian

no, it is the mainstream view on non-western far-left groups too

this is the mainstream view on the far-left

where are you people buying your bulbs, i have not touched onein a year at least

deleted by creator

fucking despise them, its disgusting that investing in renewables or green only became attractive to governments when it meant sending more money to fucking car manufacturers

ill take your seething over a fine lol

thats funny, id put taking someones rights away or even actively endorsing, threatening or committing violence against someone pretty firmly under the ‘hate’ branch and that kind of behaviours coming from more than ‘very few’ people

is this a psyop? surely its a psyop

youd probably have a hard time naming one billionaire that hasnt done anything good

theyre still a shit thing to have, practically never got the money they have by being a good person and shouldnt exist in the same world as homeless people, starvation or massively underfunded public projects

the only thing twitter is still good for is art and porn, so i use it for art and porn

tldr: yes

meta and any other company can datafarm the fediverse as is, really

none of the data on the fediverse is protected in any particular way

depending on who youre talking to it either means all communist or specifically communists who unabashedly support authoritarian sociopathic governments

communists who unabashedly support authoritarian sociopathic governments tend to frame it as exclusively an insult for communists in general, either out of a refusal to recognise any other branch of communism as actually communist, to pull attention away from their support of authoritarian sociopathic governments or to frame whoever is calling them tankies as anti-communist, and probably a fascist

i dont think our house had a hot iron even

somewhere between soc dem and communist

i have a list of issues i care about, whether those issues are fixed by properly regulated capitalism or communist utopia isnt that important to me

no actually, since the conversation is explicitly about conspiracy to commit murder, arguing that any belief in enforcing participation in society constitutes that is explicitly saying that having laws automatically means killing people

you dont actually get to say ‘violence’ instead of ‘murder’ in a conversation about murder, and then pretend that you arent talking about murder

unless this is you admitting that communism is not actually a conspiracy to commit murder, in which case cool i agree!

i have no clue how this happened

somewhere between soc dem and communist

i have a list of issues that i want fixed, and whether that happens by achieving communist utopia or just properly regulated capitalism isnt that important to me

i do not use adblock on content creation sites like youtube

its a small effort for what i assume is a small bit of support for the content im watching

i just never had an issue with ads, theyre unobtrusive and i can just do something else while theyre playing

being forced to participate in society is called following the laws of the country youre in

am i correctly understanding that you believe that enforcing the law automatically necessitates killing people? thats a pretty scary thing to believe, and in no way indicative of any particular ideology im sure

its also false, considering the continued existence of countries that have abolished the death penalty entirely

on a side note, can you explain why you moved the goal posts from ‘communists want to kill everyone’ to ‘well maybe not all of them but the ones that dont will never succeed’ to ‘well having laws means killing people’