the meat of it is concerned with property and ownership, which has little to do with the general welfare of sentient beings, so i think it was alright for the time, and totally outdated now.

why does a trolley dilemma not represent real life? why is the problem not a simple thought exercise? genuinely, GFY.

no. i’m not going to seek help. this is a simple trolley dilemma, and if you don’t understand that soon, you’re dooming billions.

not really. want to elaborate on your thinking here? i promise i can have a nuanced talk about it.

lol. who is morally justified? please explain.

exactly.

some little bitch ass coward downvoted you for this response when it’ actually one of the truest statements in this thread.

THANK YOU.

my post from yesterday was downvoted into oblivion for essentially saying the same thing: https://lemmy.world/post/13123135

fuck off. if we can fix america first, the rest of the world is easy.

exactly.

glad you finally caught up. it’s depressing to see how many good people are just catching up. it makes sensible solutions seem impossible.

Removed by mod

and the easiest way to fix the world is to remove all of them from it. Can I get an amen?