• 0 Posts
  • 51 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: June 14th, 2023
  • OmnipotentEntity@beehaw.orgtoMemes@lemmy.ml•mhmm...
    52·
    1 month ago

    An environmental posadist. Not a stance I’ve normally seen. Imo, if nothing came out of deep water horizon, there’s no oil accident big enough to matter.

    Transocean received an early partial insurance settlement for total loss of the Deepwater Horizon of US$401 million about 5 May 2010.[60] Financial analysts noted that the insurance recovery was likely to be more than the value of the rig (although not necessarily its replacement value) and any liabilities – the latter estimated at as much as US$200 million.

  • OmnipotentEntity@beehaw.orgtoMemes@lemmy.ml•I just wanted the cheap pizza
    1·
    5 months ago

    (please attend to primaries next time…)

    So… should I have voted for Marianne Williamson or Dean Phillips, keeping in mind Dean Phillips formally withdrew from the race before my state’s primary, and Marianne Williamson couldn’t have won if she had sweeped every state after and including mine?

    I think the problem is mostly that the US system of elections is turbo mega fucked.

  • OmnipotentEntity@beehaw.orgtoLinux@lemmy.ml•Don't use Appimages (a writeup about all the reasons they are a pain for users)
    18·
    9 months ago

    I’m not going to weigh in on the specifics of Flatpak vs AppImage, because I don’t know enough about the particulars.

    However, I think the “user choice” argument is often deployed in situations where it probably shouldn’t be.

    For instance, in this case, it’s not the user’s choice at all, but a developer’s choice, as a normal user would not be packaging their own software. They would be merely downloading one of a number of options of precompiled packages. And this is the thrust of the argument. If we take the GitHub rant at face value, some developers seem to be distributing software using AppImage, to the exclusion of other options. And then listing ways in which this is problematic.

    I, for one, would be rather annoyed if my only option were either AppImage or Flatpak, as I typically prefer use software packaged for my package manager. That is user choice, give me the option to package it myself; hopefully it’s already been done for me.

    There are some good things to be said about trust and verification, and I’m generally receptive to those arguments way more than “user choice.”

  • OmnipotentEntity@beehaw.orgtoMemes@lemmy.ml•very upsetting
    71·
    10 months ago

    If this is what it takes to get copyright reform, just granting tech companies unlimited power to hoover up whatever they want and put it in their models, it’s not going to be the egalitarian sort of copyright reform that we need. Instead, we will just getting a carve out just for this, which is ridiculous.

    There are small creators who do need at least some sort of copyright control, because ultimately people should be paid for the work they do. Artists who work on commission are the people in the direct firing line of generative AI, both in commissions and in their day jobs. This will harm them more than any particular company. I don’t think models will suffer if they can only include works in the public domain, if the public domain starts in 2003, but that’s not the kind of copyright protection that Amazon, Google, Facebook, etc. want, and that’s not what they’re going to ask for.

  • OmnipotentEntity@beehaw.orgtoLinux@lemmy.ml•Does Nix's break from FHS cause problems?
    1·
    10 months ago

    Because the nix package manager places all system packages under /nix/store/uniquehash-packagename-version/

    Where the unique hash is obtained via a Merkel tree of all the inputs. So in particular, binaries and libraries exist underneath those directories, not in the places you would expect from FHS.

    In order to make the system actually work, environment variables are set up and executables are patched to refer to specific paths within the Nix Store.