They’re already here- is no one following the UAP situation?
Being a bodyless head with a freak long tongue is not only okay—it can be an exciting opportunity
They’re already here- is no one following the UAP situation?
Personally wish it said
No.
You racist shite.
Edit:
Holy hell, 95% of people can’t figure out “what percentage of the emails sent by John Smith last month were about sustainability.” That is absolutely wild to me, and I already thought my perception was skewed the other direction due to working with largely disadvantaged people. That’s an eye opener for sure, thanks for sharing
I glanced at your username after reading this and thought it said PregoBoi lol
walks over to co-workers, farts, then walks back to his chair
Lmao
It’s common grammar in the states, and considered grammatically correct under Black American Vernacular English
I wasn’t asking you. I don’t have a problem blocking you
Hell yeah, I’m so ready to fight
I’m surprised to see an antinatalist support Harris. Seems morally inconsistent, though perhaps not from a consequentialist perspective. I’ve been blocking everyone sharing your sentiment, but I don’t wanna block one of the few antinatalists here, so I’m commenting instead
Is Harris’ loss my fault because I voted for De La Cruz? She could have easily earned my vote, but tried to court centrists and conservative voters instead.
Nice try, feds
Edit: this is not the best place for this very important discussion. Get on Matrix/Signal/XMPP, and get involved locally. This is a ‘no phones meeting’ kind of topic
Rats- you’re not acting fun stupid anymore, now its just annoying stupid, so I’m gonna move on.
Thanks for the good time!
160
Lol
add racism
Bruh. Like I could know you’re a racial minority.
I don’t get people banned
Respect, honestly. A few tweaks and you’re basically an anarchist already
Edit= sounds like crying about an edit to me.
Hey, you’re the one that told me to “fucking read” when you can’t read timestamps. Idk what to tell you
Right is an affirmation of receipt, yes no or maybe are the possible answers and you didn’t choose any of the above and still failed to explain.
You said “so no laws?” And I said “right.” That’s pretty clear cut to me. What do you want explained?
you could be part of any similarly idiotic idealist nonsense.
Fear not, I’m also part of plenty of other nonsense
If it’s a battle of wit, you’re losing.
Lol
Little of what you’ve said makes much sense, so I had no way to know
Let’s make a few things clear:
Also- check timestamps. I edited that comment when your other reply came through, and responded over there.
Huh? I initially said “right.” Which means “correct”/“yes.” You never asked for an explanation. You asked a yes or no question, which I answered, and then complained that I didn’t offer an explanation?
That’s not asking for an explanation. You asked a yes/no question. Yes, no laws
You understand what severe dyslexia is correct?
Yeah
And yet you are still doing it
I was asking genuinely. You wrote a whole word that you wouldn’t use in that context if you weren’t a conservative (even by mistake), and I didn’t realize your use of it was an error. I’m not making fun of you for the error. I’m laughing at you for being conservative
No.
Okay, then link me to where you asked me, and link me to where I lied, please
Edit: disregard the “link me to where you asked me” part- responding to that in our other thread
You accidentally typed the word “woke” and didn’t notice?
I wasn’t trying to make fun of your disability, to be clear. I just wanted to be mean to you. I’m also disabled.
I legitimately think you must be getting me confused with someone else
DUHHHHH
Edit: oh I see, thanks