I think it’s because they use their position to professionalise a bullshit job, presenting it as a field (HR Management), when their skills are rather ordinary. Really, they should be doing payroll and employment admin, not setting the tone for the organisation or being seen as specialists in any meaningful way. Also, job competencies and profiles disproportionality reward the “skills” found in HR, which i think reflects their input in designing these tools and templates.

Further, i find people who work in this field to have quite a high opinion of themselves and their usefulness.

HR. Have never met anyone in HR who contributed to the good.

Racist? You might legitimately be the stupidest, and most presumptuous, person I’ve yet encountered. Seriously, fuck off back to Reddit, you utter cunt.

From my extensive experience in this area (true crime podcasts lol), if your hitman is either quoting a reasonable price or offering a payment plan, they’re a cop.

Unless you’re in South Africa, in which case you can legitimately walk in to a bar and hire a murderer for a very reasonable price.

Not a lawyer or an American, but procedurally, i would guess it’s too late to take his name off the ticket, so it would still be Trump and Vance, but with couch fucker being sworn if the Rs win. However, with the potent mixture of radicalisation, intellectual atrophy, and lead ingestion, you can’t take civil war off the table either.

I’m a huge fan of Small Town Murder. 2 comedians discussing a different murder (even the odd serial killer) each week.

A fleshlight.

This might be of interest to you: https://theferret.scot/edinburgh-university-denies-surveillance-claims/

I assume because demand outstrips supply, the “value” of the rental units is inflated and landlords can charge more, pricing out locals

AI, particularly in how the likes of microsoft are marketing it to businesses.

And your belly button. Often forgotten, but an unwashed innie stinks!

Punching nazis. Always acceptable, even encouraged.

Is this a trick question? The item on the left is clearly a rolled up facecloth.

Nothing gets stuck in my teeth man.

Or, doesn’t get acid reflux man.

Guessing football and wrestling in high school, growth hormones in their meat, and an element of obesity. These are all guesses though, not shitting on the yanks.

The ultimate goal is equality, but it takes targeted support of women to attain that.

I’m not saying that men’s issues should remain unresolved, but the intent of the Tory MP is not to support men. It is to divide and conquer.

Think you can find digital copies at http://wint.co/

Who’s responsibility includes reducing the disparity between men and women. Having a minister for men introduces parity in this regard, which therefore does nothing to advance the interest of women in a male dominated system

This is the same difference between Black Lives Matter and All Lives Matter. Nobody is saying that men should not be advocated for, but elevating the issue of men’s rights to ministerial level does not help resolve the larger issue of the systemic disadvantage of women in society.

It’s a disingenuous argument. The MP is from the Conservative Party, i.e., the right wing arsehole party.

You may have noticed how the Right Wing Playbook has been imported from America. Increasingly, when things aren’t going politically well, they’ll have a look at the Playbook and pick a Culture Wars trope. This is one such instance, intended only to divide.