I’d never bother changing whatever default font the editor comes with and I don’t understand why anyone would care to

No, that’s a tankless job

He’s talking about ultrasonic-cleaning those little gold things people hang around their collar

My only pair of earbuds have a wire. The connector is usb-c and my phone has a jack. So I don’t even use the jack now

3.5 headphones that have volume controls and a pause/hang up button can’t seem to last a year. I tried 2 and they both lasted 3 months

Sure bud absolutely nothing wrong with your parenting

Why don’t my kids talk to me? Why am I dying alone?

Mark discovers hyperbola

If your goal is to get back scratches from the circlejerk don’t feel the need to participate lol

Cool, but there’s no shot any serious software company will want that shit under their brand

That’s definitely not what Google told me to do at the time in 2015

Having to create .desktop files in god knows where for me to be able to right click -> “open with” my program of choice sure pushed me away

I don’t even know what they were thinking not letting you beowse for any executable file on disk

I wish implicit returns could be turned into an error in the configs of a project. It was impopular at the time and probably still is outside of Rust, it permeated through every control structure because of how the language is designed, but the worst part is how unnecessary it was

It would’ve cost nothing not to do it

It would’ve made no one upset

Now Rust is the only language to do what it does - and it has this shit in it

That’s cool, but I’m not making software for desktop linux until there’s one standard GUI api

How would it depend?

The unholy chipotle order

That big part of you is fetishizing nuance and mistaking it for wisdom

Nuance doesn’t stand on its own, there is no sense saying something has merit because it has nuance. I can give 10 examples of things that would be moronic if you tried to add nuance into them. “Nazism bad”. “The crime of loitering shouldn’t exist”. “The planet is getting hotter”

Step up the reading comprehension please :)

It’s pretty funny having you state, re-state and re-re-state the exact same obvious things that everyone understands while not seeing that everyone gets that, that you’re missing the point, and that you’re yelling in a hole

Why do you keep going?

Are you that painfully unconvincing in real life like cmon

Step it up

Step up the reading comprehension please :)

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1466A

(a) In General.—Any person who, in a circumstance described in subsection (d), knowingly produces, distributes, receives, or possesses with intent to distribute, a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting, that— (1) (A) depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; and (B) is obscene; or (2) (A) depicts an image that is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in graphic bestiality, sadistic or masochistic abuse, or sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex; and (B) lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value; or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be subject to the penalties provided in section 2252A(b)(1), including the penalties provided for cases involving a prior conviction.

You’re really mad that a US based study is using the US definition of CSAM while also clearly stating the definition of CSAM they’re using, aren’t you?

Sure buddy, it’s a “false equivalence”, they’re totally stating it’s the same. It’s not just your reading comprehension

There’s no definite conclusion on whether consuming and distributing lolicon content could lead some individuals to seek out or create explicit content involving real children

If they rule that out entirely through the scientific method one day, then I’ll join your side

Weebs usually respond to that “Well that’s like saying video games cause violence!” so I’ll jump ahead of you, that would be like saying we should forbid Lolicon videogames in a society that already has lolicon books, lolicon movies, lolicon cartoons and where history classes mostly cover instances of countries showing lolicon to each other. That’s not the situation we’re in, and even if it was, it’s still not necessarily comparable. Sexual urges have properties that violence doesn’t share.