No, it’s image based.
You can always use the testing image if you want
All good on my device but I use fedora atomic. If it wasn’t good, I could just roll back.
And I was hoping they fork fractal such that they can both profit from each other
web-based Element Matrix client
Fork and stay at the old version until it’s fixed?
89%
Edit: this is usually where you want to look at that question https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/archlinux/archlinux.html
Why is it not stated which research paper? By whom? It’s just a reproduction of what they do which is good but the guy reporting about it acts like it’s breaking news.
That info is better than “install as few extensions as possible”.
I’ve got 20 extensions enabled. There’s no drawback so far. PaperWM is probably the most important one for me.
Sounds like you didn’t take care of selinux. Without compose file I can’t know it.
Tbo, that’s a little bit to little research you provided considering you want to use it for work.
E.g. why do you need more than 2 years of support for a workstation?
Stating that debian isn’t secure enough really confuses me as it is one of the most solid distros out there.
Like your list, I just state it without any reason.
Bad.
I would only use it if the devs are highly reputable. It contains all your passwords and possibly all your wealth as well.
I’m not saying the dev isn’t. I’m just saying that with this you really have to know what you do.
It’s astonishing.
Fedora introduced a whole new distro where you can’t install anything with dnf anymore and people love it. People love using flatpaks instead (yes I know of all the shortcomings, but you can always choose another install method for that broken package). And ubuntu users just hate ubuntu for what they do. The difference may also be that fedora gives a choice to the user and does not directly force it
You could do that. With that image everything is vompletely equal on the user device which means that debugging is much easier. Ublue makes distributing custom fedoras increadibly easy.
Damn
You should do a better job updating your documentation so that people do not waste their time like I did. This change to closed source was announced where, exactly? All of your READMEs and documentation sites do not mention this. Very easy to be confused and very disappointing to me that this went closed-source.
Not only did you sell out, you also removed all the old versions that were released under an open source license so that others couldn’t continue to use out-of-support versions. DISGUSTING.
tl;dr get off GitHub and npm entirely if you want to do the closed-source thing, kthx.
Sorry for this and others. That’s a horrible experience.
That’s good :)
GNOME looks better out of the box and configuring KDE can be very tricky. There are also a lot of outdated “addons” for KDE and you need some in order to get what you want. extensions are better integrsted in KDE but it’s not like KDE has everything out of the box. I’d love to see more KDE support.
When it launched the apps were more modern than bitwarden. If bitwarden hasn’t improved since, then it’s still the same
apparently there is a preview plugin for kate https://docs.kde.org/stable5/en/kate/kate/kate-application-plugin-preview.html , it’s already preinstalled. It works with markdown files, I guess if someone would be down, he could extend the plugin to work with typst
Ubuntu was my first distro because ubuntu was linux for outsiders many years ago. Any other distro was only for hardcore people. I don’t regret hopping around the linux world.