Which is why Conservatives are ultimately a kind of liberal.
Which is why Conservatives are ultimately a kind of liberal.
The economic policy of those countries is socialism
It very much is not
Yeah, I can’t imagine anywhere else those Avtomat Kalashnikova might have come from…
“But whatabout!”
What Chinese weapon manufacturer are you even thinking of?
Source: it came to me in a dream
had the audacity to want to be sovereign.
And we know that just isn’t allowed. Just ask the people of Crimea and Donbas…
As if you new McCarthyists can meaningfully distinguish between the two.
The goal of banning everything associated with the state designated Adversary?
we live under a hardline socialist regime in the USA. People are decieved by word games into not even understanding their own reality.
Incredible. The pure concentrate of no self-awareness, distilled into two sentences.
“Why is everyone calling me a racist, just because I said a bunch of racist things! They’re just playing the race card!”
“China isn’t as evil as the US, but if it was as evil as the US, it would be worse than the US, therefor China is worse than the US”
Least absurd white supremacist argument.
But the US seems like the lesser evil to me.
Of course it does, because the USA is white, and you’re a racist.
Of course it does; you’re a racist.
You’re racist because you think white westerners brutally dominating the world is a “lesser evil”
The caveat is that if a communist governmnet ever got that same amount of power, they would kill even more people.
Vibes based political analysis.
He’s trying for some more.
If you think liberalism is the left most position on the scale, then you’re exactly what I’m talking about
Yes, Marx definitely wrote a lot about “western chauvinism.” Perhaps you mean “social chauvinism?”
"MLs cannot imagine political theory after 1924! But also, unless Karl Marx himself explicitly said it, it isn’t real!’
Because it’s definitely very confusing language for the under studied. Perhaps you should pick up some German language.
Lol, perfect. I can tell you watch Oppenheimer recently…
Again, I just can’t help but be struck by the stark chasm between this liturgical internet “leftism,” which seems confused between the principals of pragmatic worker liberation, versus the fantasy that Lenin’s autocracy ever achieved anything noteworthy.
You think the USSR wasn’t a noteworthy improvement on imperial Russia? And your calling other people ‘under-studied’? Good lord, liberals really are proudly ignorant.
so who cares about results, right?
MLs. MLs are the ones who care about results and ‘practical workers liberation’, rather than liberals, who simply demand instant utopia while defending capitalism.
Non violently, through electoral reform preferably.
Lol. How are you going to do that? Vote for it?
“democracy is when you have two parties with the exact same policies”