Are you referring to the coalition of some NATO members and some non-NATO members (19 nations total) enforcing a United Nations Security Council decision to make an immediate ceasefire and end the civil war in Libya?

The one with zero troops on the ground?

Being in NATO had no impact on the events, NATO member support was not mandatory as per the terms of NATO. The only reason they even call it a NATO operarion was because Itally would only vote in favor of the operation if NATO members were in charge instead of France.

Removed by mod

NATO’s only function is mutual defense, NATO support ends when a member attacks.

Since the only thing NATO does is prevent War, the only anti-NATO stance is a pro-war stance.

A lot of X Users support ending all trade relations with China via heavy tarriffs.

Oh no! So you want to talk about how the mutual self defence pact is somehow oppressing you or will you just keep dodging forever?

Lmao

Well I certainly could make comparisons but thats a little irrelevnt. The core of my statement is that Lemmy doesn’t operate the way Twitter does.

For me “the fuck is that question” is just a colloquial expression of confusion, not anger.

You’re accusing America of causing Russian annexation of Crimea and subsequent war on Ukraine?

You think Russia is working for NATO?

Pressuring people into a mutual defence pact lol such an evil thing lol

Lol no

Its not expansionist because you have to request to join.

The only objecting countries whose wishes you’re referring to are nations who want to invade potential NATO members.

Lmao bro thinks the dictatorship country with the 2nd most billionaires is Communist.

If anything I said seems anticommunist to you then clearly you don’t know what communism is.

You should start referring to the nazi community “exploding heads” as “the nazi community “exploding heads”” if you dont want people to think of heads which are exploding.

Elon Musk, owner of Xitter

The fuck is that question?

It’s literally only function is a deterrent to war, including by members against others as they will not gain NATO support unless they are attacked.

Its members might exploit, but thats a meaningless statement about NATO itself because without NATO there would literally be more war.

Lmao

Mutual defense and deterrent to invasion by hostile world powers both in and outside of NATO is a bad thing? Sure, okay pal.

White Supremacy, Anti-immigrant, Anti-Trade, Anti-NATO, Anti-human-rights for LGBT, etc.

I have no context about the community, I assumed you were advocating for exploding heads of political enemies as a way of keeping feeds clean, because the comment explicitly reads as such.

There is nothing communist about Nazis, just like theres nothing Democratic about the DPRK.

When nazis start enforcing their ideology I will raise arms, until then your sentiment closely resembles the goal of propagandists on these sites: create division and cause violence.

When Musk took over Twitter he allowed violent and extremist views to flood it without moderation.

That’s the sort of community Lemmy would be if we didn’t have the tools needed to keep it clean of harmful ideologies.