Same here. That works well for desktop, they also have an electron app that wraps their web ui into a desktop app and it works well enough. Bridge works very well for any other desktop app you’d want to use.

The only trouble is that on mobile your option is their app or the web interface, no ability to use alternative apps. The mobile app is good, but not great.

Overall its a good service and I’m happy bit you need to know these limitations going in or it could be frustrating.

Such useful features. They should be built-in. But I’m glad they’re serviced separately so we get updates outside windows update cadence.

Great movie. In this case, at end of this one you can have assets and apparently also tell your friends what you’re up to.

That’s perfectly fine for some things, but for most people letting their browser choice dictate what sites they use is backwards

Did you forget the ./s or something? Lemmy itself is developed on GitHub, as are plenty of other “valuable” open source projects. To pretend nothing of value is built there is putting your head in the sand.

If you’re developing software on GitHub you have a chance at getting some useful feedback, bug reports and maybe even PRs. Like it or not, the network effect is real.

Future Idiots.

Patent Pending.

Or maybe the 512kb.club a more reasonable balance between 250 club and the 1mb club.

Also with a view: jankfree.org for a similar focus on performance.

Yes. You can. I have a personal site that is using nuxt static site mode and it renders extremely fast and clean output.

Check out https://250kb.club all performance sites focused on speed and small size.

We need caldev through the bridge app for use in thunderbird and other apps.

I felt like I had a good understanding of both htmx and csp, but after this discussion I’m going to have to read up on both because both of you are making a logically sound argument to my mind.

I’m struggling to see how htmx is more vulnerable than say react or vue or angular, because with csp as far as I can tell I can explicitly lock down what htmx can do, despite any maliciously injected html that might try to do otherwise.

Thanks for this discussion 🙂

Can you elaborate on that? I haven’t used it, but just assume if you host it on your own domain you can have it play nicely with csp, there are docs in their site about it. Where did it fall short for your use case?

Yes, and host it on Proton. They are pretty reasonably priced compared to paid offerings by Microsoft and Google, and even if you pay them you are still the product. With proton you are the customer.

Gotta build that brown fat.

Win-win.

I see what you did there.

I agree on WEI, and that’s the scary part since crappy companies will demand it in the name of security and everyone gets fucked and the Internet becomes a little less free.

Is that Cas’ car from the mid seasons or something else entirely ?

I believe that there is an extension for Firefox pwa support, but the Android version definitely supports pwas natively.

Huh? Why?

I’m way out of the loop, but is the issue that they actively make it difficult to use the rendering engine or is it that the cost to modularize it isn’t worth the payoff to Firefox itself? A subtle but important distinction IMO. I always felt it was the second, but maybe I was being dense?