Gives me stuff from months ago.

I need a proper controversial sort option. I want to know where the juice is.

I think it’s German slipping in. Thanks for feedback.

You got it, I just happen to have quite some friends from south and middle America and since it was important to them and make sense to me I took it over in my vocabulary.

Interesting, english is my third language - but I’m just bad at grammar and spelling in general. Definitely learned grammar in school - just forgot all about it.

Honestly, anyone who can speak a second language has a better grasp of what a noun and an adjective are than yer average English speaker.

Why?

I would argue that US-americans are native speakers of US-American english, which is a bit different from english spoken in england.

In English “a male” and “a female” is almost exclusively reserved for animals.

But also important to remember that quite a bunch of people are note native speakers without the feeling for finer distinctions in meaning. Like for me, since I learned english mostly in a scientific setting, those words habe little negative connotation on their own. They became negative co-notated through the use of misogynistic communities.

“Break out of frames” link

That is a memory I have suppressed.

Iframes with more iframes inside.

Yeah, sure.

Our whole discussion on abortion?

Basically expecting or forcing others to adhere to your believe system. You are a rather good example.

If that’s what you choose to believe, all power to you. If you are gonna try to force your believe down others people throats, that don’t be surprised they don’t like it.

Mostly happens by itself when people get better education. I personally don’t do anything in particular about it, since it’s not like the most important thing in my life and I happen to already live in rather secular country were organized religions are shrinking.

By people realizing they don’t need the construct of organized religion to be spiritual for example.

Keep up with the conversation. I was referring to organized religion as a construct not people.

There are differences between for example a mostly secular democratic country and a theological authoritarian regime.

I never hid my contempt for most organized religions as systems of oppression throughout human history. At the same time I respect peoples individual spirituality, as long as they don’t force it on others.

No I actually meant Leon Trotsky, just wrote his name from memory. He wanted more the Cambodian way of communism.

So far, yeah. I estimated two centuries for individual actions to wash out

Even if I would accept that estimation, in those two hundred years the lives of many humans are greatly impacted, which is for me all that matters in the end. Since I like to view history from human point of view this seem pretty relevant. If you take an impartial abstract point of view - than nothing really matters since the universe will disappear anyway at some point. Maybe that’s the difference in our perception.