The Linux kernel would maintain a list of the latest Intel microcode versions for each CPU family, which is based on the data from the Intel microcode GitHub repository. In turn this list would need to be kept updated with new Linux kernel releases and as Intel pushes out new CPU microcode files.
Sounds like that would be outdated for everyone without a rolling distro.
Nah, it’s still considered Personal Data under GDPR, because it’s possible to connect to natural persons. So GDPR applies. And this is illegal, there is no legal basis for processing this data.
Release submissions should really include a description what the project is about.
Wine was first released in 1993. I hope our children are there to see the take off.
I hope this makes it easier to do TLS sniffing and security research on Android apps. A lot of developers seem to rely on no one simply looking at how much information is exposed in the APIs apps use. Currently because it’s much more difficult to sniff Android apps, a lot of privacy/security issues are not raised.
I’m optimistic, since technical arguments can be pretty heated yet they end like this:
Can you find any links where one can read about this?
If Finland is wasting tax payer money to something shady, it should be brought to the local media.
As a finn, I understand that there are probably legal reasons for doing this.
I just wish they would be transparent and share those reasons with us. The Linux kernel is certainly not the only free software project that is impacted, if this comes straight from EU/US sanctions. Maintainers of other projects have a lot of interest in what is happening.
Transparency is also important because if EU/US policy/sanctions are causing issues for free software projects, then that discussion needs to be public, so that there is a chance to amend the policies if necessary.
finland has pretty bad, climate-change-exploitation-fucking-over-the-third-world dealings in my country
Which country is that, and what dealings?
There may be worse countries, but rest of the word is not in a proxy war with them.
Yes, not only is it realistic, it has actually happened. It’s easier to write code than understand it. Even when reviewing code, you miss more or less obvious issues. Not to mention intentional vulnerabilities that can be sneaked in over multiple commits and time span long enough to make reviewers forget the larger context.
Look buddy, you don’t need to use it if you don’t want to. Just remove the package. I’m sure telnet will continue working!
Is there a good summary of Gitea/Forgejo background somewhere?
Installing nvidia-driver package wasn’t enough?
Going with the closed source driver means stuff breaking each kernel update.
What distro are you using if nvidia breaks after every kernel update? What do you need to do to fix the breakage?
I’m a finn, so the only advice I can give is that it’s pronounced like luanti in finnish.
Not very useful, I know, sorry. Nau ai häv tu kou präktis mai rälli inglish.
Just tell her that you told them your wife didn’t like the name so they changed it.
It’s finnish, so like it’s written. Foreign concept for english speakers, I know.
The use case sounds exactly like git-annex.
As a bonus you get a system that tracks how many copies of files and where you have them.
You can start with
dpigs. Then start marking packages automatically installed withapt-mark.aptitudemay be a good frontend when removing a lot of packages, you can mark entire categories, like libraries, as automatically installed.Pay attention to the package headers when removing packages. You don’t want to remove essential packages.