Fedora, it’s bleeding edge, but stable enough for a daily driver. Also, most things work out of the box.

Why can’t mom and pop store compete with Costco?

This how you sound.

50 dollars a year for a note taking application? How can anyone think that this is remotely reasonable? Also, can you not shill this so hard? I don’t have strong feelings for Joplin, but the way that you’re trying to knock it down, it’s bordering mental.

I use Joplin, my notes are synced across devices, and I pay 0 dollars. I’m using Dropbox to sync, also a free account.

Still don’t know what you’re talking about. Anyway, in capitalist free America people are shot for knocking in the neighbour’s door, is that better? Lest we talk about the private jail system that demands prisoners, in order to be sustainable.

Which past is this that you speak of? And how is the present a better option than anything at all, really?

There is only one correct way to pronounce it. Everyone who pronounces it the other way is a moron.

I know you want to go deeper, but here’s a nice summary of linux’s early history: https://lwn.net/Articles/928581/

That’s not accurate, the image is missing sleeps between each print.

The only crybaby I’ve seen so far is you.

There’s no need for that, we’re all on the same side, and the GNU tools may not be an os by themselves, but they are a crucial part of any Linux distribution.

I used infinity for reddit, so naturally I switched to eternity.

I have a small gripe with this article: CTRL+K, CTRL+U and CTRL+W don’t “delete”, they “cut”, and the clipboard can be accessed with CTRL+Y, which the article also fails to mention.

Took me 2 minutes, literally.

It’s true, there are factors that will make things sort of work, or make them go downhill very fast. In Portugal, there was a lot of deregulation in the past few 20 years, which brought higher prices, monopolies and fixed prices. That’s my main reason for not believing in deregulation, but I understand that there may be exceptions to this. I just think that they’re precisely that: exceptions to the rule.

Also, I love that I’m having a deep conversation in the memes community!

I didn’t have to search much to find an article talking about the corruption in the Brazilian telecommunications free market: https://teletime.com.br/10/12/2019/o-passado-mal-explicado-das-telecomunicacoes-no-brasil/ Sure, you can argue that many of these companies simply went bankrupt, but the weight of those bankruptcies falls on the same shoulders every time: private profit, public loss. Sure, there were a lot of telecoms opening at that time due to the government opening up the market, but at what cost?

It does matter because you cannot isolate the effects of regulations from the corruption, violence, etc… All of which are huge issues in Brazil.

Regulation is hardly on the top 20 Brazil problems list. Be serious.

Regulations are made to make sure that businesses comply with the minimum safety and health rules, as well as not actively harming the consumer. So, no, no area benefits from deregulation. Giant companies love deregulation so they can monopolize and/or fix prices. Getting to your barber example: if I’m trying to find a barber, I will surely only look for licensed barbers, as I surely do not want a busted hair job, or to incur in any hazard. Simple as that.

Let’s be honest, this is simply not true. Regulation acts in favor of the weaker link, no area benefits from deregulation.