pragmakist

deleted by creator

It’s German, and you’re about as right as anyone trying to say a German word in English can expect to get.

Yeah.

And we can still block entire sites on the web.

The sites the friends with adblockers promote.
The friends who don’t notice what they promote.
What unholy bastards the people who own the sites they promote are.

In Buddhism, yes.

For Hindus, well, it’s complicated.

For other people who happen to believe in reincarnation?
That would be anybodys guess, I guess.

In Denmark the case surrounding “Nøddebo præstegård” caused copyright to be enacted.

I’ve noticed the theme come up in other countries, amongst these France, but I’ll grant that I may have overestimated its importance by overfitting to prior knowledge.

The purpose of copyright in the USA, and as far as I know in Brittain, yes.

But please remember that in much of the rest of the world copyright is a reaction to people, creators, getting in trouble over third party usage of their creations.

Leading to the idea that a creator should have the power to stop people from using their works for whatever the creator deems objectionable.

Can we be totally honest here and just state what the fear is?

If slaves could vote they’d vote for freedom.

There’s a hole the size of a railroad junction in the 13nd amendment.

Ford was innovative because he used the scientific method to find out how long the work-week should be from a factory-owners perspective.
And then he set it to that.
If you’re a cog in a wheel in a factory that is still the ideal work-week from your owners perspective, sorry.