In that case, “a lot” instead of alot. I might as well put The Oatmeal’s excellent guide here.
In that case, “a lot” instead of alot. I might as well put The Oatmeal’s excellent guide here.
He’s an Adonis!
and Fake. Eyebrows.
🎵Call Mr. Plow
That’s my name
That name again is
Mr. Plow!🎵
Orion isn’t bad, with his belt and “sword”.
1)Zero issue with what was spent. Why does it cost so much?
Cognitive dissonance much?
—
2)Almost zero success.
I disagree, but it’s way too complicated for you and I to hash out here, especially coming at the issue from opposite ends, you as a perhaps general citizen and me as a teacher. Maybe a long hangout at the corner coffee shop would be in order some day.
The Pentagon asked for less. It most certainly IS over-budget. When I say “the military” I mean the Military Industrial Complex, of course. I’m a supporter of our military, of the people actually in it. With a budget greater than the next ten countries combined, the M-I-C is outlandishly frivolous.
Regarding this, but more to the KC schools topic, it seems like your philosophy of budgeting is that only 100% = success, and anything less = failure.
You may revise your opinion after reading the summary and conclusion, but maybe you just figure the liberals at Michigan Law can’t possibly understand all the nuances vs someone watching their local news.
Also, it doesn’t have to be all or nothing. Your skimmed analysis of silly twists of numbers belies the full picture, and in my opinion, total desegregation without changing the major obstacles of the systemic segregation of the city’s real estate, was doomed from the start.
BTW, I agree with you that merely throwing money at an issue without cause isn’t correct. One might argue against the ridiculous and constant over-budgeting of the military, for example. In KC, I believe it had many successes, though obviously not a complete realization of the goals (that shouldn’t have needed to be implemented in the first place).
You should look past the Cato Institute’s analysis of the KC schools situation. For example, the summary and conclusion sections of this article from the University of Michigan law school show that the conservative criticisms are based on myth.
I dreamed this several weeks ago:
I was with a couple of people on the street near some parked cars when all of a sudden this comically large, brown and white patched moose kind of…appeared in front of us. My 6-year-old daughter also appeared right next to me, saw the moose, and uttered—in her little girl voice—“God DAMN!”
I woke up laughing my butt off.
Some of them say it exists, but “iT’s JuSt WeAtHeR!”
deleted by creator
My religious friend has always said, “What the freak?!” with great enthusiasm and no irony.
“…may be the largest example of fossilised human feces ever found, measuring 20cm (8 in) long and 5cm (2 in) wide! Analysis of the stool has indicated that its producer subsisted largely on meat and bread. It dates back to approximately the 9th century and the person responsible is believed to be a Viking.”
It’s pretty big…I guess.
Happened to me yesterday. Also, you can replace GPS voice with backseat toddler voice.
“Quiet please, Daddy wants to hear his song.”
He said “or something”.
This was a lovely interaction with a great ending to what would more likely have ended angrily on the other site. Glad I moved here. Positive waves to you both.
Two stories:
The last time I stayed in a Motel 6, maybe 35 years ago, the towel was practically tissue paper.
I once delivered a box of towels to the Senate Club at the Forum (back when the Lakers played there), and wow did I ever see how the wealthy live! Those were the biggest, most luxurious towels I’ve ever felt.
Huh. That’s actually the one that sprang to mind, but all this time I thought those were the same creator. 😄