No, but I found Waldo.
No, but I found Waldo.
I mean… They’re not fucking wrong.
Maybe, but as I always say, today’s “crazy conspiracy theory” is tomorrow’s news.
Only if you’re inclined to believe the conspiracy theory first.
Doesn’t mean plenty of them don’t know or care that he’s trying to put microchips in people’s brains.
Now, here’s the thing. I’d say you would be sharing those winnings with the original winner unless you prevented them from getting the ticket
The January 2nd Powerball draw was not won by anyone and paid $39M.
That’s plenty of seed money to invest in Google, Bitcoin, et al with perfect knowledge of stock trends. Even if it’s only short term knowledge due to breaking from the original timeline, you could easily grow your investment into the billions overnight.
That’s not so much losing your home as it is having it forcibly purchased from you at a fair market price. At least in theory.
What kind of friend wouldn’t allow ear licking?
What an incredibly hot take. Like how is asking about a place to go where you’ll find memes that are more enjoyable to you dictating anything?
Ah yes! Herbs and spices, the original chemicals and preservatives.
I think we could work it out. We can for driving tests.
I don’t think we can. Have you seen the results of our “driving tests”?
In all seriousness though. I get what you want to do, but this isn’t how you get there.
Honestly, I would just ban it entirely at this point. I’d rather see the abolition of marriage entirely than have the government dictate who can and cannot participate (outside of consent issues, obviously).
I mean, go forth. Be fruitful. Multiply.
Eat, drink, be merry with each other.
Just leave the government out of it.
I like your ideas, but have you considered that this one:
All natural resources, be it harvested (e.g. ores, oil) or otherwise (e.g. land, air), are property of everyone. If any individual is to monopolise and/or utilise some of these resources, they are to compensate everyone else for doing so.
Effectively makes literally everything free? Not that this would be a bad thing. It just makes so many of the other things irrelevant.
You’ve had plenty of time to elaborate on your claims of the “rampant success of workers unions” and your answer is “Google it”?
No. This is unacceptable. You tell me what you believe is evidence of the “rampant success of workers unions” or concede that there hasn’t been anything approaching "rampant success of workers unions"in quite some time.
Savor the Federation!
But if you’re American it was 1937.
Right. So, 86 years ago? How does this explain the rampant success of workers unions?
And when was this, exactly?
how do you explain the rampant success of workers unions?
Excuse me? The what?
No, but it is raising some alarm bells.