I’m particularly interested in low bandwidth solutions. My connection to the internet is pretty rough 20mbps down and 1mbps up with no option to upgrade.

That said, this isn’t limited to low bandwidth solutions.

I’m planning on redoing my entire setup soon to run on Kubernetes followed by expanding the scope of what my server does (Currently plex, a sftp server and local client backups). Before i do that i need a proper offsite backup solution.

  • HighPriestOfALowCult@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t back up anything I can rebuild. I have multiple half-assed methods in use together for the rest of it:

    • Backups daily of homedirs on desktops and laptops using Borg and Vorta to external usb drives. These devices get rotated out annually. I used to run 2-disk RAID1 and when I rotated the disks out, split them and sent them to family but now I’m taking my chances on having them local and putting them in a fireproof box.
    • Code repos are synced to github or srht.
    • Monthly backups of homedirs are sent via borg to rsync.net.
    • Desktop and laptop homedirs get periodic (roughly monthly) burns to Dual-Layer BDRs which I put in the fireproof box and sometimes hand off to family.
  • Estinos@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Sorry, not a direct answer to your question, but still something you may consider : I don’t, my backups never leave my home network. I have redundancy on several machines, and my “the house is on fire” solution is to have one of those backups on a sd card that I keep in a 3d printed amulet I made and that I keep around my neck. When people ask me what it is, I tell them it’s an amulet that protects me against memory loss, it’s always a good laugh. :) And if that burns in the fire, well, I probably don’t need backups anymore anyway.

    • lps2@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wish I had data that could fit on an SD card - I too don’t have off-site backups mostly due to expense. I have one other friend that is into homelabbing but for us to each backup on each other’s hardware would be ~$2k/each. Probably more on his end because I believe he’s using a consumer NAS without the room for additional expansion whereas I have a 25 bay commercial setup that’s only 1/5 populated at the moment

  • pound_heap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not my solution, but I liked an idea and thinking to use it too - copy backups on external HDD and put it into your car trunk. Maybe have two drives in rotation.

    It eliminates a need to drive somewhere for rotation, and any cost of renting a safebox.

    Doesn’t protect from a serious disaster like forest fire or earthquake or nuclear war, but I keep the most important data in cloud, and if my house and car burns I would be having other problems than worrying about some homelab snapshots.

    • alphafalcon@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Very neat idea, but I’d explicitly add strong encryption to that method, cars do get broken into.

      I’d encrypt every off-site backup, but a car is a bit more exposed than a rented safe box.

    • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      actually not a bad idea. i live in a flat so my car is parked in a car park like 200m away from my property. if my entire town goes up in smoke then i imagine that losing data would be the least of my problems

  • ipkpjersi@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have a cottage, so I rsync to my computer there, and I also have a computer and Synology NAS there for further backups. If I end up selling the cottage though… I’m not sure lol. I don’t really have anything too too irreplaceable honestly outside of stuff I already backup to multiple cloud backups too.

  • Philip@endlesstalk.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    My setup is running in k8s.

    I have autorestic running in a container in a pod. The container mounts the volumes from the pod, I want to have backed up. It then runs every 6 hours(easily changed via a cron expression).

    The config in autorestic describes the backends(servers), that it should backup to. Currently I have 3 servers, that it is backing everything up to.

    I have also added extra functionallity to autorestic, to make it create a dump of a database before the backup runs.

  • 486@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Any backup software that supports incremental backup should work similarly bandwitdth-wise. I like Restic. You can even do incremental backups with plain rsync, if you want. If your data does not change much, than you should be okay. For the initial backup run it would be helpful if you have physical access to the remote location so you can bring a full backup there without having to upload it through your slow uplink.

    • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Definitely an option if I’m a bit more selective with what i back up. At the moment for the client backups i’m zipping and encrypting the entire home folder for each client once a week. I could probably write something that looks for file changes and uploads just those

  • codefossa@social.codefossa.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    @PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@lemmy.ml Remote backups might be rough with that upload speed. For example, you will be looking at over 2 hours per GiB uploaded.

    I personally have a 3 node setup using kubernetes and I run longhorn for volume management. I do hourly snapshots, and then daily backups of all volumes to an additional drive on one of my 3 nodes with a simple NFS server which is also running in kubernetes. In longhorn I keep 2 replicas of every volume as well so losing one doesn’t hurt anything.

    I would imagine it would be pretty easy in this case to replace my local NFS with AWS storage and then I would have remote backups, but since I back up roughly 100 GiB per day that would be a little time consuming. At my 50 Mbps that’s about 4.5 hours, though remote backups could be done less often as a last resort backup.

    • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah it is pretty rough although the files don’t necessarily change all that much so if i can set up a backup somewhere and prepopulate it with my data as it stands now then incrementally keep it update it with nightly jobs then i’m hoping it’ll mostly be done by the morning.

      My backup backup plan would be to buy a couple high capacity solid state disks and either take them myself or mail them to my parents once a week. The mailman has pretty high bandwidth, even if the latency is rather rough

  • Starfighter@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Might not fit into your plans but if you run Proxmox you can easily backup to an offsite computer (or VM) running Proxmox Backup Server (PBS).

    From their website:

    By supporting incremental, fully deduplicated backups, Proxmox Backup Server significantly reduces network load and saves valuable storage space. With strong encryption and methods of ensuring data integrity, you can feel safe when backing up data, even to targets which are not fully trusted.