• Sybil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    So, let’s say the workers form Soviets. Those Soviets have to be destroyed, right?

    it is going to depend, isn’t it? are the soviets operated with consent and consensus?

    i already explained i have no illusions that i can dictate what it’s going to look like after the revolution. i do know what i won’t tolerate.

    • brain_in_a_box@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      I do know what i won’t tolerate.

      So? It’s not like you’ve got consensus authority to destroy them. Though it does sound like you would try to anyway

    • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      are the soviets operated with consent and consensus?

      Is this material to whether the soviet is concentrating power? Either way you have a small group of people making legislative and executive actions.

      • Sybil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Is this material to whether the soviet is concentrating power?

        a system that operates with consent and consensus has no authority.

        • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Okay, you need to actually define authority, because I feel like each anarchist I’ve encountered has a different definition.

          • Sybil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            I know this was lazy. but I think it’s good enough.

            edit: oh. this is a bit better