What I think could make Lemmy superior to Reddit is the ability to create themed-instances that are all linked together which feels like the entire point. I’ve noticed that a lot of instances are trying to be a catch-all Reddit replacement by imitating specific subs which is understandable given the circumstances but seems like it’s not taking advantage of the full power that Lemmy could have.

Imagine for a moment that instances were more focus-based. Instead of having communities that are all mostly unrelated we had entire instances that are focused on one specific area of expertise or interest. Imagine a LOTR instance that had many sub-communities (in this case “communities” would be the wrong way to look at it, it would be more like categories) that dealt with different subjects in the LOTR universe: books, movies, lore, gaming, art, etc all in the same instance.

Imagine the types of instances that could be created with more granular categories within to better guide conversations: Baseball, Cars, Comics, Movies, Tech etc.

A tech instance could have dedicated communities for news, programming, dev, IT, Microsoft, Apple, iOS, linux. Or you could make it even more granular by having a dedicated instance for each of those because there’s so many categories that could be applied to each.

What are your thoughts?

  • Matthieu@piaille.fr
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    @_finger_
    We can have both generic instances and instances around a particular topic.

    We already have a few lemmy dedicated to a particular community like latte.isnot.coffee and startrek.website

  • BurningnnTree@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think the main point of decentralization is to spread the burden of hosting around so that no individual has control of the system. I think having themed servers like what you’re suggesting would aid in discoverability of different communities, but the downside is that that would mean individual servers would have monopolies on certain subjects.

    • ewe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly. Also, people might not want their handle being associated with a specific niche hobby they have, though they might be there a lot/all the time (e.g. I don’t want to be “ewe@hentainsfw”, but I sure as shit am going to be spending a lot of time there).

      I kind of feel like it would be best if we had some “user” instances that are nice and always up and most of the communities lived on “community” instances either grouped or just spread out. That way if any single community gets too big on an instance, it doesn’t necessarily bog a bunch of users down as well (e.g. all the users on lemmy.ml that are hamstrung by being on the overloaded hardware on that instance).

      • hugz@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Over on Mastodon I’m at mastodon.world purely because it’s the most generic sounding instance and I don’t particularly want to have my whole identity to be defined by where I live or the operating system that I use or whatever

  • kevincox@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t agree. If I like LOTR and giraffes I don’t want to create an account on both “instance groups”. I want to do like today and create a single account, then subscribe to the communities I am interested in wherever they are.

    To me it sounds like you are sort of mixing up community location and community discovery. This is sort of the case right now because instances have a list of local communities but I think that it is best that they are separated. For example on Reddit I don’t generally find new communities by scanning the entire list of communities. I usually find them when someone mentions a related community in a comment of a community that I am already in. Or when I stumble across a community when searching the web. When you discover and subscribe to communities this way it doesn’t really matter where they are hosted or if they are grouped. You can organically discover things that interest you over time (although I agree that it can be a bit slow to start).

    • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      If I like LOTR and giraffes I don’t want to create an account on both “instance groups”.

      But you don’t have to create accounts on multiple instances. You can subscribe, post, and mod communities on other federated servers.

    • feduser934@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t understand what you mean. Isn’t the point of federation that one account on one instance is as good as an account on every instance? I’ve never felt the need to hop between instances.

      • notun@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        OP’s post is about having specialized instances, making hopping around necessary. It’s not convenient enough as it is.

        • AtomHeartFather@ka.tet42.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Making specialized instances does not in any way make hopping around necessary. If you join a specialized instance that doesn’t already sub to the communities you want, you just add them.

          Example: I join a Star Trek themed instance that has a bunch of locally created star trek communities. I want to sub to all those, but i ALSO want to sub to the homelab community on beehaw. I just subscribe to !homelab@beehaw.org FROM the star trek instance I am a member of. That star trek instance will then start syncing the homelab content from beehaw and you can read and reply from the star trek instance.

          Conversely, if someone has an account on beehaw.org and they want to read a star trek community based on that star trek instance, they just need to sub to it FROM beehaw.org.

          • notun@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I know. We all know.

            Convenience is the issue here. You can’t directly go to an instance and start subscribing, you need to take unnecessary detours.

            • abraxas@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              …which would be perfectly fine if we had a better search functionality.

              If I search for something I’m interested in in some consolidated place (preferably directly from my lemmy instance or app), and it always finds what I want, and I can always subscribe to it, and links always work for it… then I won’t care about going directly to an instance to subscribe.

        • feduser934@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          By hopping around, do you mean changing your account to one on another instance, or viewing a list of communities on an instance, or something else?

          I don’t feel that changing accounts is necessary because of the magic of federation. But I don’t know how to view a list of communities in an instance without leaving your home instance. That would be a cool feature, but is only really important when you’re initially picking all your subscriptions.

          • notun@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Exactly, it’s really inconvenient right now. And it’s really important for the usability of what OP suggested.

            If I simply link to a cool community I found, like https://beehaw.org/c/programming, you can’t follow that link conveniently if you’re from another instance.

            And I highly disagree with only being important at the start. It’s a big hurdle that stifles growth right now and in the future.

            • this@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Agreed, what needs to happen is an option that allows users to follow links from foreign instances in their home instance seamlessly. I have to imagine with the ramped up amount of development in lemmy that some of the devs must be working on it.

            • Da_Boom@iusearchlinux.fyi
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              That’s more of the interface you’re using a fault for not interpreting links correctly - it should be obvious that url/c/communityname should be interpreted as a community, just as !communityname@instance.org (right now jerboa is interpreting it as an email address) should also be interpreted as one, and if you remove the ! It should be interpreted as a username.

              But most interfaces are open source, so give them time and someone (maybe even you) can submit a pull request that fixes it. That’s the beauty of open source - in time the bugs get ironed out because it’s a collaborative effort.

            • AtomHeartFather@ka.tet42.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Yes you can subscribe to and read/reply to that community from any lemmy instance. You just need to add it if the instance doesn’t already federate with it.

              Go to ‘Communities’ at the top of your instance homepage then in the search bar put the url of the community you want to add. (example: https://beehaw.org/c/programming)

              This next part is undocumented, and might just be a bug. But this is the magic part.

              On the next page, change the top search dropdown from Communities to All.

              You will see the community you want to sub to in the results. It will say something like.

              Programming@beehaw.org - 0 subscribers

              Click it, then on the top right pane click “Subscribe”

              Done

              • notun@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Jesus Christ. I’m well aware of how you can subscribe to other instances. This is about convenience, with problems arising from situations like I described above.

                • AtomHeartFather@ka.tet42.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Having some additional messaging about how communities work, and how to subscribe to them would help. I’m sorry that I assumed you didn’t know how to do that. I meant no offense but there’s no harm in providing free information that you (or someone else reading this post) might not know about.

                  There’s no way for an instance to know that you have an account on some other instance so the subscribe button assumes you are a local user. Maybe that could be addressed in the future, I don’t know what the plans are.

                  At a minimum I would think the subscribe button could have some logic that can detect whether you are logged in or not and then give you some options. Like, log into your account if you have one on this instance, or if you don’t here are instructions for adding this community to YOUR instance.

          • Spzi@lemmy.click
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t know how to view a list of communities in an instance without leaving your home instance.

            On lemmy:

            1. Click ‘Communities’ (top left menu)
            2. Search using the search box (top right)
            3. Select ‘Communities’ from the drop down (top left)
            4. Make sure to toggle ‘All’ (*not *‘Subscribed’ or ‘Local’).

            This will show you communities matching your search term from all instances*.

            You can then subscribe to communities regardless on which instance they live and use them seemlessly, regardless of wether they are local or not.


            *) It will show you communities matching your search term from all instances, if your instance has already discovered that community.

            If it has not, it shows ‘No Results’. You can force it by some exclamation mark shenanigans which I haven’t understood well enough to explain. After that, your instance knows about that community in the other instance and will show it in future search results. I think as soon as one person from your instance force-discovers a community from another instance, that community becomes searchable for everyone on your instance.

            • abraxas@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The asterisk is the problem, IMO. There’s even a (I consider it a) bug where you have to deselect “Communities” from your search and choose “All” if you want to directly search for a community by its global name. Probably some interaction with global names and URLs, but it is a bit unintuitive.

    • Stumblinbear@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m currently working on a Lemmy mobile client and have implemented multi-accounts until it’s easier to do this. Basically you can make multiple accounts on different instances and aggregate the data from them all into a single feed. It doesn’t currently prioritize posting from specific accounts (you just select a primary)–I’m trying to figure out a good way to go about doing it so you can section things off 👀

      • Sal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why do you need multiple accounts on different instances. You can have an account join a community on a different instance.

        • Countsheep@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          How? I know I can follow a community but I can’t get a general feed of that instance. That’s the issue they’re solving

        • socialjusticewizard@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Same reason people have multiple accounts on other sites. You don’t always want your comments on local news to intersect your comments in a professional community or your comments on a game site. Storing them on other instances is another small layer of security.

        • Stumblinbear@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Not necessarily! I’m doing it in Flutter which can do desktop and web export (though web doesn’t feel native).I only specifically called out mobile since that’s what I’m targeting, but nothing stops be from putting out a desktop client

    • _finger_@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Having the ability to link your account to different instances might be a way to solve that, or you have the ability to keep accounts separate depending on the instance. Right now we can link specific communities from other instances to another instance which is great, but being able to switch instances easily from one master account would be pretty great

  • Carchi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I guess it’s the point of the fediverse as far as I understand. Kind of like being members of a bunch of old school forums. Unfortunately for me it’s not really what I’m looking for, and I like the unified aspect of reddit.

    • dystop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      unified is nice, but if i’ve learnt anything over the past 9-10 years as a redditor, it means you’re at the mercy of admins and power mods. And because it’s become the go-to forum, it’s gotten so much attention from stealth marketers and bots (it’s hard not to unsee such posts once you learn to identify them), and karma whores trying to get the first witty remark in so it’ll get boosted up into the first top-level comment.

      I kinda like the idea of a fediverse - it’s like a bunch of forums, but connected in a way that makes it so much easier to browse and read all of them, and doesn’t have the “centralisation of power” problem reddit has.

    • LoreleiSankTheShip@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s nothing stopping you as a user from subbing to different communities on all of those instances to get a feed exactly how you like it.

      The only difference would be that mods would belong to an instance themed around their interest with a like-minded admin for it. Also, you could pick more niche topics than you can now. Let’s say I’m into tech, but I don’t care about AI. I could go to the Tech themed instance, pick the news and linux communities from there, sub to those and get them in my feed while ignoring the ai related communities.

    • nik282000@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unified is bad, always. If you need examples look at Windows, Android, iOS, Facebook, Amazon. Having a large selection roughly equal options promotes improvement AND cooperation. For example the Linux ecosystem is made up of hundreds of distributions that make a number of major choices about their systems but still allow the user to run the same software.

      • Landrin201@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I disagree with the example of operating systems, unfortunately. Linux in my experience is just a worse user experience than either Windows or Mac OS. I know that probably won’t be a popular opinion around here, but I think that most users would agree as well. I’ve never used a linux OS that was intended for daily use that felt anywhere near as intuitive and easy to understand as Windows or Mac os.

        I agree with you in general, but I think that what naturally tends to happen in markets is that one product gets improved to the point of being “the best” among its competitors and starts to really pull away, and once people are in they are in- most people don’t want to switch from the OS they have, to use your example, to another one unless their current OS is REALLY not doing something they need to be able to do to the point where switching would be easier.

        A lot of platforms don’t start out intending to completely, 100% outcompete everyone else in their marketspace- I actually think Amazon is a great example of that. But once they start to take over, they don’t stop because the economic system we have makes it both very difficult to do so and also very lucrative to keep it going

        And in some things, unity is kind of a good thing. I think Lemmy (and the rest of the fediverse for that matter) needs to figure out a way to centralize user logins- the fact that your instance could get taken down by its creators and lose your account altogether isn’t a great one. Yes, that’s a risk with a site like Reddit too, but it’s significantly less likely over there.

  • Kasrean@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Would be nice if it was “divided” by user types too. Imagine a post about a new Marvel movie and you could view a shared comment thread but also filter to remove “marvel-fans”, or see only “cineasts”, without leaving the thread. Could lead to more bubbles, but could also make it really easy to see what other bubbles are thinking.

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is good but at the moment the user base isn’t big enough to support splitting interests like that.

  • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    My thoughts are what if the instance admins or mods are pricks? What if the instance shuts down?

    I think the power of the fediverse is that there is redundancy with the communities on different instances. I feel like it’s a very human need to have everything neatly organized and in its place, but the internet is all about redundancy to ensure no single points of failure.

    The fediverse mimics that by creating a web of small related communities, spread out over multiple instances, ran by different people, rather than a giant single community for one thing, on one instance, run by one person.

    • _finger_@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      This was the case with Reddit as well, there were a lot of competing subs created due to shitty mods and rules so I don’t think it’d be much different in this case

      • slapmefive@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        The real issue with instances shutting down is losing access to a user account. Correct me if I’m wrong, but there would be no way to login/recover an account from an offline instance.

        • _finger_@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Im honestly not entirely sure but that seems to be the case. Everyone is worried about mod power and decentralization but what about the power of instance owners over your own account? If I take the time to link a bunch of external communities to one instance, what happens if the instance goes down? All that work is gone

          • Ataraxia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s why I made an account in every instance I was interested in. I don’t cqre about my post history and what not and if i want to keep important info I’ll just save the page to my phone.

          • radarsat1@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            This is a good point and makes me wonder: is there any interest in running a personal instance that has no communities, just for the sake of being in control of your own identity? Would that even be an appropriate thing to do? And if so, how would you convince instances to federate with you if you have no content?

            • socialjusticewizard@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Being able to host a local instance seems like a really interesting approach to owning your own user data. Also a way to have a “blog” site like the relatively new profile posts on reddit.

  • twistedtxb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think it will more of less follow that path naturally in the years to come, if it ever catches on. You can already see this happening with some instances (ie lemmy.ca mostly devoted to canadian topics, etc)

    You have to remember that the amount of lemmy servers exploded in the past week or so. We’re pretty much figuring this out collectively

    • dizzy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      waveform.social is handling a lot of music-making topics. I think this is better than simply being region based. I understand the need for communities of different languages but I don’t really understand the need for ones specific to different english-speaking regions. Instances based on similar interests makes the most sense to me.

      • Spzi@lemmy.click
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t really understand the need for ones specific to different english-speaking regions

        Makes perfect sense for regional events. This can be anything like weather, disasters, military excercises, cultural or sports events, regional politics, infrastructure projects, astronomy …

        On my local subreddit, I was able to check what that noise was that I just heard, where all the emergency vehicles are racing towards, or follow hilarious regional stories.

        Of course, for non-regional topics like music (unless it’s a regional event) I’d go to a non-regional sub or community.

  • anj@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think this is definitely the right approach and would greatly help adoption. There’s so much potential for overlap under the current model (10 different communities for one sports team, for instance) and trying to just be a federated Reddit misses the mark IMO.

    I took this approach with Magic: the Gathering at https://mtgzone.com which is just focused on MTG and has communities specific to the formats and interests areas within the game.

  • bcoffy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    So sort of like what the forums of yore were like? You’d have a website for a dedicated, broad topic (like a video game franchise or a brand you like), then subforums for topics in it (specific games in the series or specific products by the brand)

  • Landrin201@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I agree that this seems to be the intent behind Lemmy. But, I also think that, right now, there is such a big influx of people that need accounts that we need to route them into as many instances as possible to keep server stress down. And that means that a lot of communities will be generalized by the new users.

    I agree with other comment that this will likely happen organically over time. After things stabilize I think we’ll see communities begin to merge with identical or similar communities on other instances. And at that point server admins can start to take a bit more of a firm hand with their instances to try and do exactly what you’re describing, if that’s what they really wanted.

  • manitcor@lemmy.intai.tech
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    AI and machine learning tech instance over here looking for members. ran themed communities BEFORE reddit and slashdot, doing it again.

  • JompaOfG@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I agree with what you’re saying. I’ve been contemplating back and forth about whether I should create a board game instant where you gather various board game discussions in the same instant.

  • Moonguide@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think, in time, those will come organically. Maybe those communities won’t be purpose built to be dedicated to a single topic, but despite federation I wouldn’t be surprised if instances popped up with rules about topics discussed. Still federated, but communities within themselves will be regulated somewhat.

    I’m not sure how to feel about this, maybe it’s just the time I spent on reddit has jaded me, but there’s divisive topics that I’m not sure would do well if housed within the same instance without coming down to name calling and unsavoury behaviour. A reddit example, early days r/lowsodiumcyberpunk2077 and r/cyberpunk 2077, both held extremely differing opinions. An even worse example because politics got into the mix, r/thelastofus and r/thelastofus2. If mods keep on top of it with good rules set in place and are enforced, could be good.

    I’m not sure either if forcing topics to newly deployed instances is a realistic path, either.