What are the best lightweight open source browser engines? Not specific browsers, but the engines themselves, such as Webkit, blink, Qtwebengine, and others

If some of you can go in deph about:

Memory usage and speed difference between the different browser engines.

    • Rob200@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Any browsers that currently use them and what are these engines like?

      • Chris@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Duktape is used by NetSurf, but the JS implementation (in NetSurf) is incomplete - specifically there’s no dynamic layout engine so a lot of stuff doesn’t work.

        • toastal@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Partial support is sadly pretty useless at present. Developers target ‘latest’ big engines, so unless you are up to yesterday’s spec, there is a good chance their JavaScript will give you nothing but errors.

  • Rob200@lemmy.zipOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Lately I been using qtwebengine on Falkon browser, but with it being a chromium based engine, was hoping for alternatives, like webkit and others.

    • toastal@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      The forks are good. Looks like someone new wants to maintain w3m which includes features I have been waiting for.

  • TootSweet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Honestly, “browser engine” and “lightweight” currently don’t belong in the same sentence. Unless you’re going for something with very little functionality compared to Webkit or Gecko or whatever. We can hope that changes with time, but I don’t think there are a lot of prospects.

    As far as “little functionality” options, there’s the Dillo browser. I’m not sure its engine is really easily “seperable”, so to do so might be some work. It’s surprisingly maintained. Its latest release is from 3 months ago. It’s definitely extremely lightweight. (Unless you’re comparing it against, say, elinks or something.)

    As for somewhat promising projects that are not yet anywhere near ready for prime time, there’s the Ladybird browser. Again, I don’t know how seperable the engine is. And I don’t know how lightweight this one is either.

    • Rob200@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      You are right. I guess I was interested in web engines with as much or close to as much functionality as web kit or gecko but maybe some that might be lighter on resource usage as i’m using it.

      I heard of one browser engine made in a colab with Samsung and Mozilla called Servo made with rust and that it was meant to be lower resourced then todays browsers engines.

      I just installed Epiphany browser earlier today running off of Webkit, it doesn’t have as many built in features as Falcon but for Fediverse sites it works with little issue. But sites with more adverts and javascipt things very well might slow to a crawl quickly on that.

    • Rob200@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I had acknowledged that it was based on Chromium, do you know of any notable alternatives?