REgon [they/them]

  • 0 Posts
  • 33 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
cake
Cake day: August 19th, 2024

help-circle



  • I am happy to see you’ve taken the Dalai Llamas advice and dropped the weird faux-casual tone you attempted before. May this be the first step on your way to enlightenment.

    Like fishing in a barrel with a shotgun.

    > Say something stupid
    > Get called out
    > Heh sure triggered you :smuglord:

    It’s so funny how you swarm like pirhannas with penis-envy when you get called out.

    It’s just me responding to you, and you seem to be the only one talking about being envious of dicks.
    I gotta give you this, you’ve mastered the weird non-sequiteur. This is the second time in a row I’m baffled as to what motivated your strange response.


  • REgon [they/them]@hexbear.nettoAsklemmy@lemmy.mlWhat word or term annonys you?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    26 days ago

    “Anecdotal evidence” lmao. Yeah bud the historical analysis and the reference to trends are super anecdotal. Sorry for not providing you with leagues of documents in what I thought was a chill civil interaction.

    Aight.

    rage-cry <- You. I cannot imagine getting this butthurt over a casual conversation.

    Iono why I tried interacting with a hex user in the first place. It always seems to end up in derision and self-labeled omniscience.

    If you meet a person who stinks, then you’ve met a person who stinks. If everyone stinks, then you’ve stepped in dogshit - Dalai Llama. The Llama also told you to look inwards and be less of a redditor. Also to drop this weird faux-conversation tone you’ve suddenly adopted in an attempt to appear above it all. He said it’s cringe.

    Anyways here’s the poem with a significantly different meaning of sweet summers child - because of course it is. The meaning of sweet summer child only makes sense within the universe of GoT. https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=mGQSAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA52#v=onepage&q&f=false - It is here referring a lovely breeze, a sweet child of the summer.
    And whoops what’s this? https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&q=Sweet summer child&hl=da Oh wow would you look at that, it sees a drastic increase alongside the release of the first season of GoT. Odd. Huh. I’d go into the interesting reasons for why the first usage doesn’t line up with the series release or the first book, but you’re being a whiny little pissant so now I’d rather not and hopefully annoy you some more.
    Fuck you








  • Calling someone a bot or a shill because they post something you disagree with. It’s so stupid. Like even if the person is a bot, would that matter if the point they’re making is salient and sourced?

    “I don’t need to engage with the fact Biden has deported more people than Trump, because you are actually russian. Thus I have no reason to investigate my worldview.”???

    It’s also such a tell. Like the person can’t imagine anyone thinking anything other than what they think, so they must not be real people with internal lives. Can’t imagine independent thought, literal NPC behaviour.
    Especially because it’s always the most average of redditor-take-havers that say it.


  • The question was “what term annoys you” not “what term annoys you that you’re sure Lemmy will approve of” (or that a malignant narcissist billionaire isn’t also annoyed by).

    Nowhere in that question does it say you are free from being criticized for your dumbshit worldview. It’s a public forum, you write something, don’t get surprised when people respond.

    To me it’s like if I say I enjoyed the sunrise" and someone says, “you mean the Earth sunrise?”.

    That’s incredibly weird. To me it’s like someone saying “I’m trans, and you?” And the other responding “I’m cis.” Funny how that works.

    I’m open to an explanation of a commonplace situation where it’s necessary to have a separate word for “is of the gender that matches that assigned at birth.”.

    See above. Also see: Whenever you need to classify yourself as cis-gender in any survey, form or likewise.