Your timeline is straight up fucked. In short, you don’t know what you’re talking about.

Imagine you are driving the bed

actually quite enjoyable, ty!

deleted by creator

ehh… I think you’re missing the part where Microsoft is actively exploiting its customer base throughout its entire product catalogue - the likelihood that this is an actual win is no.

They wouldn’t be, they would be sorted by signal strength. I think that’s around 40-50% of the joke, though.

There’s no good reason to be using :80 even internally.

I get it, but you’re arguing in favour of negligent IT. If nobody dares to touch something, it is a liability.

When it comes to getting the attention of others, there’s always an incentive.

The collaboration features in 365 fuck up and get in the way a lot more often than they work correctly WITH ONLY TWO CONCURRENT USERS. Conversely, I’ve seen entire classrooms in Google Docs working together like it wasn’t even a thing.

I don’t have a lot of love for any of these companies, but what you are saying is objectively false.

I appreciate that you don’t fuck around when it comes to defending your laziness.

using a rly bad word but pretending not to is kinda weird

3-2-1

Forget about the third-party assessment, how do you think you were doing?

Not saying this is not possible, but your story does seem a bit simple.

Hmm. They both do that. Why did you switch back? The app is just a wrapper around the PWA to provide a bit better integration.

Oh! Thank you! I assumed these were admins or something, but it seems it highlights users on my own instance. Stupid feature.

While we’re here, how many of your comments has Voyager eaten?

Off topic: I see your name in orange in the Voyager app. Is this a per-comment flag on Lemmy (that you have the option to set when posting), or just something apps might do based on the value of an account-level flag?

Edit: disregard, see below.

This is really good, I just want to clarify one thing:

there are specific protocols that are traditionally used on those specific ports

Protocols are not ‘used on ports’, it’s actually the other way around: TCP and UDP are both protocols operating on top of IP, each with its own set of ports to help direct traffic, exactly as you explained.

There are other protocols, like ICMP or GRE, that exist quite happily without knowing anything about ports (ICMP has types and codes, GRE doesn’t).

Edit: I suppose it is actually a bit ambiguous because we also refer to applications (HTTPS, telnet) as protocols. I’m not sure if there is a standard way to differentiate when discussing other than just saying transport layer protocol / application layer protocol.

deleted by creator

do you want them to be stupid or not?